<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plame, but dirty instead of dangerous</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beerdrinker.org/2003/11/07/plame-but-dirty-instead-of-dangerous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beerdrinker.org/2003/11/07/plame-but-dirty-instead-of-dangerous/</link>
	<description>Beer is Good</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:19:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.beerdrinker.org/2003/11/07/plame-but-dirty-instead-of-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beerdrinker.org/?p=288#comment-286</guid>
		<description>By that definition, then Madeleine Albright was a &quot;political nobody&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By that definition, then Madeleine Albright was a &#8220;political nobody&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pril</title>
		<link>http://www.beerdrinker.org/2003/11/07/plame-but-dirty-instead-of-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>pril</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2003 22:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beerdrinker.org/?p=288#comment-283</guid>
		<description>he&#039;s a political nobody.  He&#039;s never been &lt;i&gt;elected to office&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he&#8217;s a political nobody.  He&#8217;s never been <i>elected to office</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.beerdrinker.org/2003/11/07/plame-but-dirty-instead-of-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2003 15:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beerdrinker.org/?p=288#comment-281</guid>
		<description>Political Nobody?  Know your Governator.  Schwartzenegger has had his hand in the political pot for years.  He went on the campaign trail with Bush (Part I &amp; II) and married Maria Shriver (i.e. a Kennedy).  As early as the late 80s, he has stated in numerous interviews that he has political aspirations.  

I don&#039;t think that California felt that they couldn&#039;t do any worse with a political nobody.  I think a combination of economic anger, star-power, and a GOP platform promising &quot;change and reform&quot; ushered the Schwartzenegger into the Governor&#039;s Mansion.

But that&#039;s just my take... as an Ex-Californian too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political Nobody?  Know your Governator.  Schwartzenegger has had his hand in the political pot for years.  He went on the campaign trail with Bush (Part I &#38; II) and married Maria Shriver (i.e. a Kennedy).  As early as the late 80s, he has stated in numerous interviews that he has political aspirations.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that California felt that they couldn&#8217;t do any worse with a political nobody.  I think a combination of economic anger, star-power, and a GOP platform promising &#8220;change and reform&#8221; ushered the Schwartzenegger into the Governor&#8217;s Mansion.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s just my take&#8230; as an Ex-Californian too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pril</title>
		<link>http://www.beerdrinker.org/2003/11/07/plame-but-dirty-instead-of-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>pril</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2003 14:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beerdrinker.org/?p=288#comment-280</guid>
		<description>someone metioned to me that CA needed an able manager to fix it&#039;s problems when Davis was recalled.  The thing is, with Davis&#039; career in politics going back about 30 years, with a stint as the state comptroller, AND lieutenant governor, they HAD an &quot;able manager&quot;, and he didn&#039;t do his job.  That&#039;s why they stuck it there.  CA voted in a political nobody because how could he possibly make anything worse than someone with 30 years of experience did. 

That&#039;s my take, as an ex-californian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>someone metioned to me that CA needed an able manager to fix it&#8217;s problems when Davis was recalled.  The thing is, with Davis&#8217; career in politics going back about 30 years, with a stint as the state comptroller, AND lieutenant governor, they HAD an &#8220;able manager&#8221;, and he didn&#8217;t do his job.  That&#8217;s why they stuck it there.  CA voted in a political nobody because how could he possibly make anything worse than someone with 30 years of experience did. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s my take, as an ex-californian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
