<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is google losing their edge?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beerdrinker.org/2007/10/30/is-google-losing-their-edge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beerdrinker.org/2007/10/30/is-google-losing-their-edge/</link>
	<description>Beer is Good</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:03:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BryceZ</title>
		<link>http://www.beerdrinker.org/2007/10/30/is-google-losing-their-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-416911</link>
		<dc:creator>BryceZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 07:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beerdrinker.org/2007/10/30/is-google-losing-their-edge/#comment-416911</guid>
		<description>Even in today&#039;s volatile market, ad likeability should have a positive effect on stock prices of companies advertising during the Super Bowl broadcast. The first step for you to understand the stock market is to understand stocks. A share of stock is the smallest unit of ownership in a company. If you own a share of a company’s stock, you are a part owner of the company. Most people wouldn&#039;t think to get a payday loan to buy stocks with – but you may want to think about it, or at least buying some stock next Monday.  Monday itself won&#039;t be important, because the day before is Super Bowl Sunday, and most people will be watching the Super Bowl ads.  Typically, if a Super bowl ad is well received, the price on the stock market for shares in that company goes up, faster than you can get a payday loan.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Click here to read more:http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2009/01/30/stocks-super-bowl-payday-loan/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even in today&#39;s volatile market, ad likeability should have a positive effect on stock prices of companies advertising during the Super Bowl broadcast. The first step for you to understand the stock market is to understand stocks. A share of stock is the smallest unit of ownership in a company. If you own a share of a company’s stock, you are a part owner of the company. Most people wouldn&#39;t think to get a payday loan to buy stocks with – but you may want to think about it, or at least buying some stock next Monday.  Monday itself won&#39;t be important, because the day before is Super Bowl Sunday, and most people will be watching the Super Bowl ads.  Typically, if a Super bowl ad is well received, the price on the stock market for shares in that company goes up, faster than you can get a payday loan.  </p>
<p>Click here to read more:http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2009/01/30/stocks-super-bowl-payday-loan/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerzy</title>
		<link>http://www.beerdrinker.org/2007/10/30/is-google-losing-their-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-411708</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 21:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beerdrinker.org/2007/10/30/is-google-losing-their-edge/#comment-411708</guid>
		<description>Absolutely, looooong way to go !
However, the question could be: did they start in that direction ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely, looooong way to go !<br />
However, the question could be: did they start in that direction ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: megan</title>
		<link>http://www.beerdrinker.org/2007/10/30/is-google-losing-their-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-411578</link>
		<dc:creator>megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 05:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beerdrinker.org/2007/10/30/is-google-losing-their-edge/#comment-411578</guid>
		<description>As a system administrator I have dealt with MS&#039;s product delays, bug fixes (or lack of) and poor support.  Although I don&#039;t use Google on a professional level, I do use many of Google&#039;s tools daily and as an end user have had nothing but positive experiences. All I can say is that Google has a long way to go before it is as smug and manipulative as MS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a system administrator I have dealt with MS&#8217;s product delays, bug fixes (or lack of) and poor support.  Although I don&#8217;t use Google on a professional level, I do use many of Google&#8217;s tools daily and as an end user have had nothing but positive experiences. All I can say is that Google has a long way to go before it is as smug and manipulative as MS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerzy</title>
		<link>http://www.beerdrinker.org/2007/10/30/is-google-losing-their-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-411576</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 00:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beerdrinker.org/2007/10/30/is-google-losing-their-edge/#comment-411576</guid>
		<description>I agree with Rick, and actually have been thinking that myself for a while.  At my job in IT, I have opportunities to work professionally with both Google and Microsoft â€“ we buy their products, but I also use many of their tools for personal purposes.

While initially working with Google felt like a being a part of great new adventure and people acted like under a spell - they could do no wrong; however, more recently in dealing with product bugs and release delays Google feels more like good old MSFT.  I am not sure this can be attributed simply the fact that â€œthey do not get itâ€.  I think itâ€™s a result of combination of a Complex system with human nature; since I am sure there are people there who do get it.  

I think that like with any fast pace growth, over time there is risk of becoming complacent, bureaucratic, and full of fragile legacy code, etc. â€“ very easy to accumulate when simply running without alignment to a strong vision.  Itâ€™s difficult to see who is providing that vision at Google nowadaysâ€¦ That becomes a lot harder when dealing with many new employees; they added thousands in recent months, and over the last couple of years many of these new employees came from high up or creative positions at Microsoft.  Itâ€™s bound to have some impact on their direction and ethics.

Sometimes, Google is reaching out; like in recent case of enabling their GMail for IMAP interfaces.  So, when it servers them, they know how to add some strategic and architectural thinking to the process, however I agree with Rick, itâ€™s usually an afterthought and driven mostly by some business arterial motives rather than simply serving the community well. 
I am not sure what is happening to their motto â€œdo not be evilâ€.

Check out this recent monologue for additional interesting details: http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007/pulpit_20071102_003354.html

For the purpose of full disclosure, I do own some Google and Microsoft stocks, but I do not care much about the financial gains, I would prefer to be proud of either or both of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Rick, and actually have been thinking that myself for a while.  At my job in IT, I have opportunities to work professionally with both Google and Microsoft â€“ we buy their products, but I also use many of their tools for personal purposes.</p>
<p>While initially working with Google felt like a being a part of great new adventure and people acted like under a spell &#8211; they could do no wrong; however, more recently in dealing with product bugs and release delays Google feels more like good old MSFT.  I am not sure this can be attributed simply the fact that â€œthey do not get itâ€.  I think itâ€™s a result of combination of a Complex system with human nature; since I am sure there are people there who do get it.  </p>
<p>I think that like with any fast pace growth, over time there is risk of becoming complacent, bureaucratic, and full of fragile legacy code, etc. â€“ very easy to accumulate when simply running without alignment to a strong vision.  Itâ€™s difficult to see who is providing that vision at Google nowadaysâ€¦ That becomes a lot harder when dealing with many new employees; they added thousands in recent months, and over the last couple of years many of these new employees came from high up or creative positions at Microsoft.  Itâ€™s bound to have some impact on their direction and ethics.</p>
<p>Sometimes, Google is reaching out; like in recent case of enabling their GMail for IMAP interfaces.  So, when it servers them, they know how to add some strategic and architectural thinking to the process, however I agree with Rick, itâ€™s usually an afterthought and driven mostly by some business arterial motives rather than simply serving the community well.<br />
I am not sure what is happening to their motto â€œdo not be evilâ€.</p>
<p>Check out this recent monologue for additional interesting details: <a href="http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007/pulpit_20071102_003354.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007/pulpit_20071102_003354.html</a></p>
<p>For the purpose of full disclosure, I do own some Google and Microsoft stocks, but I do not care much about the financial gains, I would prefer to be proud of either or both of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: megan</title>
		<link>http://www.beerdrinker.org/2007/10/30/is-google-losing-their-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-411556</link>
		<dc:creator>megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beerdrinker.org/2007/10/30/is-google-losing-their-edge/#comment-411556</guid>
		<description>I love Picassa too but I don&#039;t use the &quot;web&quot; portion of it.  Anyway, I tend to disagree with you about Google becoming more like MS. MS has their heads so far up their asses that they have lost complete touch with what people want/need. I think Google knows what people want/need but haven&#039;t quite figured out how to integrate it fully. I think they are still very new and have a lot of maturity ahead.  I am happy to know they are giving MS a run for their money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Picassa too but I don&#8217;t use the &#8220;web&#8221; portion of it.  Anyway, I tend to disagree with you about Google becoming more like MS. MS has their heads so far up their asses that they have lost complete touch with what people want/need. I think Google knows what people want/need but haven&#8217;t quite figured out how to integrate it fully. I think they are still very new and have a lot of maturity ahead.  I am happy to know they are giving MS a run for their money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://www.beerdrinker.org/2007/10/30/is-google-losing-their-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-411511</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beerdrinker.org/2007/10/30/is-google-losing-their-edge/#comment-411511</guid>
		<description>I suppose based on their stock price today most of the world would disagree, but I don&#039;t usually call financial firms for computer advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose based on their stock price today most of the world would disagree, but I don&#8217;t usually call financial firms for computer advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
